Talk Quesada forum

Posted: **Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:23 pm**

Roach wrote:Back in the day you used to have adverts where your friendly doctor/dentist recommended smoking cigarettes. Look what happened with that once the truth came out. EMF exposure will go the same way. Take the WHO and the NHS as trustworthy infallible health sources if you want LOL. After all, they must be doing something right when more people are sick and diseased these days than ever before.

No, I don't take the WHO and NHS as "infallible", not least because they don't purport to be so, but their published research is logical, reasoned and balanced. Where are your links to research organisations that support your theories and categorically state that you are correct?

Posted: **Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:19 am**

What is the bet that these people who say the NHS, and pharmaceuticals world wide, are dodgy would not stop their mother or daughter from taking her heart pills..?

..

--

Posted: **Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:24 am**

mondo wrote:What is the bet that these people who say the NHS, and pharmaceuticals world wide, are dodgy would not stop their mother or daughter from taking her heart pills..?

..

--

Of course, and they've obviously never accepted the advice of their local GP, been to A&E in an emergency, etc. etc.

But more importantly to the topic of discussion, they still haven't provided independent evidence to support their assertions.....

Posted: **Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:32 am**

There have been more than enough cases of approved drugs having disasterous effects.
Thalidomide for one.
We're drifting a bit though.
Where I work we have had strokes , heart attacks , infertility, brain disease , migraine ,stillbirth just that I can think of off the top of my head.

Posted: **Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:44 am**

Scipio wrote:There have been more than enough cases of approved drugs having disasterous effects.
Thalidomide for one.
We're drifting a bit though.
Where I work we have had strokes , heart attacks , infertility, brain disease , migraine ,stillbirth just that I can think of off the top of my head.

In itself that really doesn´t mean a lot..

for instance how many worked there?.. .

. what is the average age group?

..what other environmental variable were there?

Where had they worked before?..
were the incidents statistically normal or not?.

If there was a contributing cause from the working conditions I dare say the Environmental Health and the Health and Safety Exec would be interested..

.

Posted: **Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:29 pm**

The Spanish version ?

Talk Quesada forum

Is it dangerous ?

Re: Is it dangerous ?

Re: Is it dangerous ?

Re: Is it dangerous ?

Re: Is it dangerous ?

Re: Is it dangerous ?

Re: Is it dangerous ?